In this paper I outline a challenge for experiential passage realism, the view that we veridically perceptually experience the robust passage of time. The challenge lies in accommodating recent empirical data, according to which ~ 35% of people do not report that it seems as though time robustly passes, and ~ 65% report that it does. I argue that offering a plausible explanation for this data is especially challenging for the experiential passage realist. This gives us reason to reject experiential passage realism either by adopting a form of passage realism according to which although time robustly passes, we do not experience its passing, or by adopting deflationism, the view that time does not robustly pass, and we have veridical experiences of a passageless world.

在本文中，我概述了经验通道现实主义的一个挑战，即我们真实地感知地体验到时间的稳健流逝。挑战在于适应最近的实证数据，根据这些数据，~ 35% 的人没有报告说时间似乎过得很稳健，而 ~ 65% 的人报告说确实如此。我认为，为这些数据提供一个合理的解释对于经验段落现实主义者来说尤其具有挑战性。这让我们有理由拒绝经验通道现实主义，要么采用一种通道现实主义的形式，根据这种形式，尽管时间稳健地流逝，但我们并没有经历它的流逝，或者采用通货紧缩主义，即时间不会稳健地流逝，我们对一个没有通道的世界有真实的体验。